Vallentuna kommun · Public client
A shared history makes quantity regulation clearer
Vallentuna kommun brought quantity claims, documentation, dialogue and decisions together in CASAI. With quantity control and client support from Diagona, the review became easier to follow and the financial follow-up more coherent.
- Quantity control
- Client support
- CASAI
Workflow in Vallentuna: the contractor registers quantity claims with documentation, questions and supplements are handled in CASAI, the client reviews and decides, and approved quantity claims are used in financial follow-up.
Vallentuna kommun
The quantity claim can be followed
- 01
Claim and documentation
The contractor registers quantities and calculations.
- 02
Dialogue and supplements
Questions and supplements are gathered in the same flow.
- 03
Review and decision
Responsible roles assess and document decisions.
- 04
Financial follow-up
Approved quantity claims are used in follow-up and forecasting.
CASAI Keeps the history throughout the flow.
Shared documentation for the project's parties
In the project's ongoing quantity regulation, the client and contractor needed to handle quantity claims, forecasts and the associated documentation. The project organisation needed to see which documents had been submitted, which questions remained and what had been decided.
The aim was to bring the information together so that review and follow-up could start from the same history.
Specialist support in a single digital process
Diagona contributed quantity control and client support. CASAI was used as the platform for quantity claims, forecasts and review of quantities.
Quantity claims were linked to calculations and documentation. Questions and supplements were handled in the same flow, so the dialogue stayed with the documentation through to the decision.
A clearer path from quantity claim to decision
The contractor registered quantity claims and attached documentation. Site management and project management could then review, request supplements and document their decisions with access to the consolidated information.
This made the review simpler and faster. The shared history also reduced the need to work out which version or earlier assessment applied.
Better conditions for financial follow-up
Approved quantity claims became part of the project's financial follow-up and forecasting. Quantity claims lacking sufficient support could be identified and handled before they affected the project's finances.
For the project organisation, this way of working meant a better overview, clearer decision trails and fewer discussions about history and documentation.
Do you want better structure in your quantity regulation?
We will go through your quantity claims, review steps and documentation and assess what support the project needs.